That being said, iMovie is not the program for scaling your production up in quality. iMovie is designed to be a user-friendly editing program that you can import your footage into and edit with as simple of tools as possible.
Warp stabilizer final cut pro#
Note: CoreMelt provided a copy of Lock&Load for the purpose of this review.Filmora vs iMovie | Head-to-Head Comparison (2021)įinal Cut Pro vs Premiere Pro: See This Before You Buy! (2021) Comparison at a Glance
If you’re already paying for the subscription then get out there, shoot, then fire up AE. Finally, Creative Cloud (though expensive) comes with a ton of tools (Photoshop, Premiere, Illustrator – just to name a few) and many of you are already paying for the suite. Yes, you’ll spend just under $400 for FCP X ($299) and Lock&Load ($99), but that’s still $200 less than what you’d pay for one year’s subscription to Adobe’s Creative Cloud. It can also accommodate 4K footage if you’re shooting video. It gives you a lot of control over stabilization and it’s FAST.
If you’re wiling to spend an extra $99, Lock&Load is a very capable stabilizer that will serve you well. If you need to do the occasional hyperlapse just get yourself a copy of FCP X and use IntertiaCam. Warp Stabilizer, ofcourse, did a great job as expected. I was also pretty surprised by Lock&Load not only was it pretty fast at analyzing the motion in the clip, but it also comes with a slew of controls letting you fine tune the stabilization area and amount. It’s not perfect, but it far exceeded my expectations. I was surprised by IntertiaCam – I just didn’t expect it to do that good of a job. So, I lined up the three stabilizers (InertiaCam, Lock&Load, and Warp Stabilizer) and created the video below comparing my raw sequence with the stabilizers’ output:Īs you can see, the three stabilizers are pretty close in terms of the job they do. Looking through blog entries, I saw a slew of folks talking about Lock&Load, but I couldn’t find examples of it being used with hyperlapses. One stabilizer that came up often in my research is CoreMelt’s Lock&Load. Unfortunately, however, fine grain control (like the ability to choose the stabilization area, or the ability to adjust stabilization in a specific axis) just isn’t there. Surprisingly, FCP X’s IntertiaCam stabilizer is pretty good at working its magic on hyperlapses. It’s really a no-brainer – even if you hate the Magnetic Timeline.
Warp stabilizer final cut install#
Adobe Premiere is great, but for $299, Apple’s Final Cut Pro X is an excellent non-linear editor you can install on multiple computers.
Warp stabilizer final cut mac#
And, in fact, there is – if you’re a Mac user (yes, I said cheaper and mac user.) Alternativesįirst: the editor. “ There just has to be an alternative”, I thought – as I set about finding a cheaper way. For those who are paying Adobe’s $9.99 subscription fee, however, the question is: does it make sense to up the payment to $49.99 per month just to create hyperlapses? In a word: no – especially for your typical hobbyist or semipro photographer. Many are even content to stay on Photoshop CS6 while paying annually for the latest version of Lightroom. Most photographers are paying $9.99 a month for Photoshop and Lightroom. You really want the stabilizer in Premiere or After Effects.Īll this sounds great, until you do the math. Yah, you can use other stabilizers, but they’re just OK. Create the video sequence in post and stabilize it in Adobe’s After Effects’ Warp Stabilizer.Move about the same distance between exposures.Make sure you point your camera at the same spot as you move.Most discussions of hyperlapses go something like this:
0 kommentar(er)
